by Chigumbu Warikandwa

The Zimbabwean government  assembled a National Peace and Reconciliation Commission (NPRC) mandated to investigate and make recommendations on past injustices in Zimbabwe. The need to set up this Commission was necessitated by the disquiet brewed by the post independence violence which continues to divide Zimbabweans.

Sporadic violence sparked by armed militia broke after mainly Zipra combatants refused to accept the end of the war and the instruction that all former fighters in the war were to be demobilised and surrender arms of war to the winning government led by Zanu PF which had won the watershed election of February 1980.

Refusal by the Zipra combatants to be demobilised was also influenced by their lack of acceptance of loss of the election.

Considering that Zapu felt that they were victims of the disturbances, they cried loudest and continue doing so today. This is despite that violence broke out following their refusal to accept the end of the war. No Government can sit on its laurels knowing the existence of armed militia within its borders.

Countries with a legend of armed civil conflict are home to uncontrolled armed bandits outside government barracks. Such an arrangement cannot sustain continued peace and domestic security.

According to eyewitnesses interviewed by Zenzele Ndebele in his documentary "Gukurahundi Genocide 36 years later", villagers in Matabeleland were also at the receiving end of the former Zipra combatants who harrassed, totured, raped and killed demanding reconnaisance information on the government forces pursuing them.

The irony of the 'dissidents' behavior is they were attacking the population whose political rights they were claiming to protect when they refused to hand in weapons and give sole rights to managing arms to a recognized government. These dissidenrs also took their violence to other provinces far away from Matabeleland. The name Gwesela is synonymous with the word dissident in every of Zimbabwe's 60 districts because he roamed in every village in Zimbabwe before he was put down by the national army. It becomes evident that the dissidents were seeking to make the country ungovernable and distabilize the Government of the day.

The noise surrounding the Gukurahundi problem lies in one group attempting to claim exclusive victim rights ahead of others. Secondly, the same group is not appreciating Government sincerity on its clear intention to investigate and bring closure to the dark era.

Thirdly, Gukurahundists want to frame the 1980s as the only period in Zimbabwe when there was tribal attrition.

If history is to be read well, it is a well known fact that there was inter tribal conflict which carried injustices never corrected to date.

The very land now claimed to be Matabeleland today was once Mashonaland under the Changamire Dynasty. The Ndebeles were retreating from a pursuing Tshaka Zulu army following misunderstandings between Tshaka and Mzilikazi in Durban over spoils of war. After crossing the Limpopo, the war weary but experienced Ndebele Force overran Mashonaland tribes, raiding cattle, grain, women and able bodied young men. Often times, the raiding party could raid a whole kingdom and assimilate it into the raiding nation's ranks. These surrogate Ndebeles make the bulk of what are identified as Ndebeles in Zimbabwe today.

The Ndebele raids impoverished their victim tribes in both human and material resources. Because then there was no internationalism of African affairs, all these injustices are not on the past injustices diary.

This article is not seeking to justify Gukurahundi, neither is it calling for reparations of the Mzilikazi and Lobengula menaces. If anything, the  frequent raids infused Ndebele blood into Mashonaland and vice versa. Today, there is hardly any pure Ndebele or Shona. All raided Shona girls and women were quickly turned into wives and mothers.

Yours truly is a hybrid of this Ndebele-Shona interraction. My great grandfather was raided during his teens in Chirumhanzu where he was made a slaveboy before being allotted into the Ndebele regiment. His good service and loyalty in servitude earned him freedom plus a Ndebele girl to become wife. Today, my aunts and uncles speak good Ndebele earned from their father born of a Ndebele mother. The Ndebele grandmother died in Mashonaland in the 1960s speaking a varigated language fused with intertwining Shona and Ndebele sentences.

So should I celebrate and take sides when I see a fight between the two tribes? Neither do my children and the children of their children's children have any moral ground to take sides because we all have Tshaka Zulu and Changamire's blood running in us. Tribal faultlines today are never natural but social constructs of people oblivious of the dangers of tribalism .

Some of the loudest tribalist are themselves descendants of tribes that were raided and conscripted into a tribe they are bidding for against their original kinsmen.

So all the loud talk of inter-tribe hostlity must be allowed to die a natural death. We are one people. If anything, tribalism is a catalyst of neocolonialism's divide and rule strategy. Our yesteryear colonisers also have tribes. Only that they do not talk about them because such talk does not improve a nation's Gross Domestic Product.

Let the NPRC do its job unhindered. Picketing on its doors or inboxes reduces its pace of doing business. The new administration of Emmerson Mnangagwa in its wisdom saw the value of the peace body and the need to maintain it so as to bring closure to all past injustices in order to build a pedestal for sustainable peace today and into the future. Peace begins with you.