Herbert Madondo
Former Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) leader Nelson Chamisa faces serious allegations of misusing approximately US$150 000 in donor funds meant for political training workshops.
A source privy to the details confirmed that Chamisa had approached several Western embassies earlier this year seeking financial support for what he described as "critical political capacity-building programmes".
The source, speaking on condition of anonymity, revealed, "Mr Chamisa presented a detailed proposal for 'train-the-trainer' workshops to prepare cadres for a new political movement. The embassies approved funding based on these representations."
However, investigations show the money was never used for its intended purpose.
"Not a single workshop took place. The funds were supposed to train 500 mobilisers across all provinces, but the money simply vanished into Chamisa’s private accounts," disclosed the source.
The alleged diversion has caused consternation among donor circles.
"This was taxpayer money from European nations given in good faith. We are talking about complete betrayal of trust at the highest levels,” said the source.
The scandal emerges as the European Union announces an immediate freeze on funding to several Zimbabwean civil society organisations.
While EU officials cite "financial governance concerns" as the reason, multiple sources suggest the Chamisa controversy contributed to the decision.
Political analyst Evelyn Tsumba warns that the implications could be far-reaching.
"This isn't just about missing money – it undermines the credibility of opposition politics and makes donors think twice about funding democratic processes," he said.
Chamisa could not be reached for comment despite multiple attempts.
As investigations continue, the scandal threatens to overshadow Chamisa's much-touted political comeback, with observers questioning what accountability mechanisms were in place for the donor funds.
The development also raises uncomfortable questions about financial transparency in Zimbabwe's opposition politics at a time when public trust in political institutions remains fragile.
