Political Reporter

The yet-to-be-launched Blue Movement party finds itself ensnared in a web of internal discord, with allegations of favouritism casting a shadow over the appointment of cluster leaders.

Reports emerging from the Blue Movement suggest simmering discontent among members, triggered by concerns over the manner in which cluster leaders have been appointed.

A source who spoke to this publication said that cracks within the Blue Movement have surfaced, primarily centred on the imposition of cluster leaders by that party’s organising taskforce leader, Amos Chibaya.

According to a source within the Blue Movement, Chibaya's unilateral appointment of cluster leaders, including figures such as Monica Mukwada, Gideon Shoko, and Tsepiso Mpofu, has stirred discontent among members.

The source revealed that many members accuse the imposed cluster leaders of being politically opportunistic, citing their alleged support for Sengezo Tshabangu during the recall of opposition legislators from parliament.

"These so-called leaders are nothing but political turncoats. They switch allegiances at the drop of a hat, jeopardising the integrity of the Blue Movement. They are being imposed on us as cluster leaders because they are Chibaya’s allies," remarked the source.

Amidst these grievances, concerns have been raised regarding the strategic ambiguity surrounding the Blue Movement’s official launch as well as its susceptibility to infiltration.

"The delay in launching the Blue Movement creates confusion and leaves us vulnerable to infiltration. Chamisa's strategic ambiguity might ultimately lead to the downfall of our aspirations," the source continued.

Echoing these sentiments, the source emphasised the urgency of addressing the perceived injustices within that party’s leadership ranks.

"For the Blue Movement to realise its vision, it must uphold the principles of transparency and accountability. We cannot afford to harbour individuals whose actions betray the trust of our supporters,” said the source.

Furthermore, questions have been raised regarding the transparency of the appointment process, with allegations of favouritism and exclusion overshadowing the party's internal dynamics.

"It's imperative that leadership appointments are made through a transparent and consultative process. We cannot allow a select few to dictate the direction of our movement," the source emphasised.

Efforts to seek clarification from Chibaya regarding the allegations have been met with frustration, as his mobile phones were not being answered.