Utilising his platform on social media today, Professor Moyo highlighted the constitutional backing for such political engagements, referencing Section 67(1)(b) of the Zimbabwean Constitution.
Professor Moyo emphasised, “Political rights are the bedrock of all freedoms. No right holds weight without the guarantee of political freedoms, not even the right to life. A life devoid of political rights is essentially devoid of value. Consequently, every individual, regardless of their societal role or office, requires the full expression of their political rights.”
Continuing his argument, Professor Moyo pointed out that General Sibanda’s appointment is not only constitutionally sound but is also a reflection of his individual political rights.
"General Sibanda’s role as CDF and his new position as an ex officio member of the Zanu PF Politburo both fall under the protection of Section 67(1)(b). Furthermore, Section 208 of the constitution provides clear guidance for members of the security forces, allowing them to align with political parties, albeit not in an active capacity,” he elucidated.
Prof. Moyo further clarified that being an ex-officio member of the Zanu PF Politburo does not equate to being an active political participant.
"Section 208 of our Constitution does not prohibit security service members from having political affiliations. What it firmly prohibits is active participation in or holding office in political entities. Therefore, General Sibanda’s new designation as an ex officio member cannot be misconstrued as unconstitutional under Section 208,” Professor Moyo asserted.
Prof. Moyo distinguished the difference between active political participation and the ex officio role that General Sibanda now holds within the Zanu PF politburo, providing a constitutional basis for his argument.
In related news, President Emmerson Mnangagwa officially announced General Sibanda’s appointment during his address to party delegates at the 20th ZANU PF National People’s Conference held in Gweru this past Saturday.
The move, while controversial to some, has found a staunch defender in Professor Moyo, who insists that it upholds both constitutional and individual rights.
